In recent weeks, lawsuits have been filed in seven additional states
Respected conservative blogger Ed Morrissey called the Berg lawsuit a “conspiracy theory” that had been put to rest by the Obama campaign over the summer but ”has arisen like a zombie yet again to suck the credibility out of the conservative blogosphere.”
However, the 2007 document produced by the Obama campaign omits key information that normally appears on birth certificates in the United States, including the name of the hospital where he was born, the size and weight of the baby, and sometimes the name of the doctor who delivered him.
In addition, the critics of the 2007 document note that Obama's father is described as “African,” a term used today. The formal language in official documents at the time — 1961 — would have identified his race as “Negro” or “Colored.”
The Web site snarkybytes.com has produced a vault copy of a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth from 1963, issued by the Hawaii Department of Health. [See the vault copy — http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
In addition to naming the hospital and more details about the baby, the 1963 vault copy also includes the “usual residence of the mother,” and the “usual occupation” of the father. None of this information appears on the 2007 Live Birth certificate produced by the Obama campaign.
Berg has been a perennial political candidate in Pennsylvania, having run in Democrat primaries for attorney general, lieutenant governor, governor, and other offices without success. He served as deputy attorney general of the State of Pennsylvania from 1972-1980.
His credibility was tarnished by work he did for the far-left “9/11 for the Truth” campaign, which alleged in a federal lawsuit that the collapse of the twin towers in New York was caused by “controlled demolition” ordered by the president of the United States.
Nevertheless, in recent weeks, lawsuits have been filed in seven additional states demanding that Barack Obama produce an original vault copy of his birth certificate, to dispel the rumors that he is not a natural-born United States citizen.
The latest suits have been filed in state and federal courts in Hawaii, Washington, California, Florida, Georgia, New York, and Connecticut to compel Obama to release his birth records.
Lawsuits in Washington and Georgia are seeking state superior courts to force the states’ secretary of state, as the chief state elections officer, to require Obama to produce original birth records from Hawaii, or else decertify him as a candidate for the presidency.
Ironically, Obama mentions his birth certificate in passing on Page 26 of his 1995 memoir, “Dreams of My Father.” “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school,” he wrote.
Lawyers for Obama and the DNC did not return calls for comment on the current status of the case, or explain why the Obama campaign did not simply put to rest the whole controversy by releasing the birth certificate that Obama apparently cherished as a teenager.
In the past, questions about Sen. John McCain's legal status have arisen. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone at a U.S. Army hospital. McCain had legal experts vet his constitutional qualifications, and he also disclosed a copy of his birth certificate.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by JMKC on -
Obama is an ARAB/Muslim,,check his real geneology and his ARAB/African family's association with ARAB Muslims in Africa, and Obama's support of Odinga of Kenya, a mass murderer.
He has NOT legally qualified to even run for the U.S. Senate OR the U.S. Presidency. He has only presented copies of his Certificate of Live Birth NOT the required Birth Certificate. He is NOT a "natural" born citizen, he may be a "naturalized" citizen of the U.S., but even that is in question. He may actually NOT be a citizen of the U.S. AT ALL!
There is a huge conspiracy at work to get Obama into office.
Even I received three fraudulent voter registration cards at my residence, in the mail, with the Hispanic names of people who have NEVER lived at my residence. Imagine three illegal votes to my ONE vote!
We may wake up on Nov 5th and discover that the Presidential election has been stolen by these Obama Nation thieves, and our economy collapsed and this Democracy turned to Marxism/Socialism.
I know that this sounds unbelievable, but it's true!
Obama tries to lie about his connection to Ayers/Acorn and all the other radicals, because their NeoMarxist/Socialist agenda is clear. Obama taught ACORN workers and members according to radical NeoMarxism Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals". Chaos and aggression is their first line of offense!
The radical left HATES Israel. Get on just about any website in the U.S. and find out for yourself if you don't believe me!
They HATE Jews! They have been told by the leftist leaders that Jews are responsible for everything that is wrong with our government, that our U.S. policies are steered by Israel/Jews and their money.
They do not have anything good in mind for Israel if Obama gets elected.
That's one reason why Obama and his supporters have launched such vicious attacks against Gov Palin.
She has always been a strong supporter of Israel and the Jews.
She has always had an Israeli flag behind her desk for as long as she has held public office.
Obama wants to sit down and make nice with the Iranian President.
People here are so intimidated with Obama's instructions to his ignorant supporters to be aggressive and pushy and "get in their faces" that they are actually lying to pollsters about whom they are voting for.
ACORN workers and Obama supporters are so aggressive and offensive that we expect race riots to break out here, and burning of cities, before, during and after the election, regardless of the outcome.
Obama and his leftist radicals have incited race divisions during this election, and in all of the years prior to his U.S. Presidential candidacy.
As citizens who strongly support Democracy, WE WILL NOT GO DOWN WITHOUT A FIGHT!
Obama tried to pass legislation to make it possible for him to confiscate all of our guns, but THAT is NOT going to happen!
WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP!
-
Permalink Reply by anne in texas on -
What evidence do you have for your absurd vitriol? From my vantage point, there is no evidence for it. It's really just crazy rhetoric. Your enflamed rhetoric only serves to create animosity and fear. It's like you WANT all that to be true so that you can have something to fight. You are the problem for the jews, sir or madam.
-
Permalink Reply by Polarik on -
In Part One, I presented a synopsis of the events leading up to,
and after, June 12, 2008, the date when an image alleged to be a
scan of Barack Obama's "original birth certificate" was
posted to the Internet. It wasn't a copy of a traditional
birth certificate, but a copy of a "Certification of Live
Birth, or simply, "COLB," the acronym I gave
it. Hawaii issues a COLB document that is a short transcript
of a person's complete birth record -- it is only given to the
person whose name appears under CHILD'S NAME, or to a member
of his or her immediate family.
What is particularly important for the reader to realize is that there has been one, and only one, forged image of a "Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, and
that there were four copies made of this image and distributed to
(1) pro-Obama face="Verdana">Daily Kos blog,
(2) Obama's href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert"> face="Verdana">Fight The Smears
campaign website, (3) Annenberg's href="http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/has_obamas_birth_certificate_been_disclosed.html"> face="Verdana">Factcheck website,
and lastly, the St. Petersburg href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/13/obamas-birth-certificate/"> face="Verdana">Politifact website.
What is also important to know is that I was the first one, and
the only one, to prove, conclusively, indisputedly, and honestly,
that the images posted to these four websites were all made from
one forged image. Who had the original image? Right now, the
Obama Campaign is the leading suspect.
.
The original image was made from a scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian
"Certificate of Live Birth," (COLB) that belonged to
someone other than Obama (No, not his sister). This image
acquired by the scanner was then saved as a GIF file (an image
format different from the JPG format of the image copies posted
online. This GIF image was then imported into a graphics program
(NOT Photoshop) where the existing text was covered over with
portions of the background pattern, and on top of that, in the
spaces where the original text formerly information appeared,
fraudulent information was typed in to make the image LOOK like
it was Obama's COLB. I say, "fraudulent" information,
because if it were true information, then Obamasimply cold have
gotten a copy of his COLB from Day One.
.
When the alterations were completed Then, it was intentionally
resaved as a JPG, at a 45% compresion ratio -- to hide the areas
where the forging was made. That's the reason why the image
(especially the borders) looks so lousy .
People have wondered about that black rectangle covering up the Certificate Number. I can tell you now, that this black rectangle was added to the image using Photoshop,
and was the only thing added by Photoshop. I know this because
the forgery was not created using Photoshop, and neither was the
clone I reproduced following the same steps that the forger would
have followed. However, since Photoshop CS3 is contained within
the Exif information of the Kos and FactCheck images, it means
that the original forged image, the source image from which these
copies were made, was imported into Photoshop to redact the
certificate number and to make two copies: a full-sized one for
Factcheck, and a cropped one for the Daily Kos.
That's all. If Obama's real birth record does not match anything
on the forged image, then he is in pretty deep.
I proved that these images were forgeries over four months ago,
with all documentation posted to both The Free Republic forum,
and to my blog, The Greater Evil.
.
I have been collecting and analyzing information ever since that
image was posted on June 12th
.
Not only did I discover the methods used by the forger, I
validated my discovery by using them to recreate an Obama COLB
clone. Any attempt at recreating the COLB image MUST show the
same, exact pixel patterns that I found between the letters in
the original forged images.If it does not show those pixel
patterns, then it does not demonstrate how the forgery was made.
..
People say, "What about the Factcheck photos" that were
allegedly taken of a real COLB on August 22?
.
The answer begins with a conundrum:
.
They cannot be real if the image is bogus. If the image is bogus,
then so are the photos.
.
But, not only by logic, but by examinations that prove that one
of the paper COLBs (Yes, there were more than one) used for the
Factcheck's photo shoot was a color laser printout made from an
enhanced copy of the scan image -- and not the other way around.
.
You can read about my research here, on Free Republic:
.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2084512/posts
.
Or on Phil Berg's website, ObamaCrimes.Com.
.
To date, no one has been able to show that this bogus image was
the result of scanner artifacts, JPG artifacts, anti-aliased
text, or any other naturally occurring phenomenon.
.
There is only one possible way for the Obama COLB image to look
the way it does, and that's by direct graphic alteration of the
text made after the scan image was saved.
.
Basically, this is the smoking gun, and the only smoking gun in
this birth certificate conspiracy. Yes, it is a real conspiracy
considering who and how many people are involved in this forgery
and cover-up.
.
This image is shown below. It was first posted on the pro-Obama face="Verdana">Daily Kos blog who claimed that it was sent to them by the Obama Campaign:
width="585" height="575">
On the same day, the Obama Campaign posted a duplicate copy of that same image on their website, href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert"> face="Verdana">Fight The Smears,
(FTS) although the size of their copy was reduced to about 42% of
the Kos image:
width="585" height="575">
What very few people know about this image is that it was taken down the very next day, replacing it with one half as big and poorer in quality (the original FTS
image was 1024 x 1000 pixels, the replacement is 585 x 575
pixels). Did FTS take down the original because some people were
finding anomalies in it? The entire FTS web site has only one
purpose: to mislead the American public by labeling as
"smears" all of the factual statements made about
Obama. Posting a bogus birth certificate on their website
fits their modus operandi.
The headline that redirects readers to their statement about Obama's birth certificate is shown below. Following it is the text of the email that FTS urged
supporters to send to their friends.
Barack Obama has made his birth certificate public and it can be seen here color="#0066CC" size="3" face="Verdana"> color="#0066CC" face="Verdana">.
You may have recently heard right-wing smears questioning Barack Obama's birth certificate and citizenship. These assertions are completely
false and designed to play into the worst kind of
stereotypes. You can see Barack Obama's birth certificate for
yourself and help push back with the truth...
As of September 13, I can confirm that face="Verdana">FTS is still posting the same image, the same headline, and the same
email letter. What is also of interest on the FTS website is
a reference to "the independent group, Factcheck.org."
FactCheck.org is most definitely not independent
group, but belongs to the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the
University of Pennsylvania: a Center run by Obama supporters and
funders.
FactCheck.org was also the third group to post a copy of
the now infamous Obama "birth certificate"
image to their href="http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/has_obamas_birth_certificate_been_disclosed.html"> face="Verdana">website four
days later. Only this time, an uncropped copy of the image was
posted:
FactCheck claimed that "bloggers raised questions based on the absence of evidence, specifically the lack of a publicly
available copy of a birth certificate and the supposed secrecy
surrounding it". According to FactCheck, Tommy Vietor at
the Obama campaign sent a message to them and "other
reporters" saying, "I know there have been some
rumors spreading about Obama’s citizenship, so I wanted to
make sure you all had a copy of his birth certificate."
Three months later, no other "reporters" have ever
received a copy of this "birth certificate" image, or
any other birth certificate image, for that matter, from
Tommy Vietor or any one else. To reiterate, there has been one,
and only one, image alleged to have been scanned from Obama's
"original birth certificate," and that the only people
alleged to have received a copy of this document image from
the Obama Campaign have been (1) Markos Moulitsas, the creator of
the face="Verdana">Daily Kos, a
pro-Obama blog, and (2) href="http://www.factcheck.org/about/">FactCheck face="Verdana">, a pro-Obama political research group.
The wildfire begins
From the first moment this image was posted to the Internet, the
reactions and criticisms spread like a wildfire through a forest.
While Obama supporters -- who still cling to its claimed
veracity today -- celebrated its appearance as a way to
squelch Obama's skeptics, Obama detractors not
only protested its appearance for the data that it held and
lacked, but also for the way it looked to them; that is, nothing
like this one:
src="http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963-sm.jpg">
To anyone not born in Hawaii, Obama's "original birth certificate" looked nothing like what a
traditional birth certificate should look like (such as the one
above). At a minimum, original birth certificates
contained the names of the hospital where the child was born
and the doctor who delivered the baby. Birth certificates also
had signatures and stamps or embossed seals on them that
certified their validity. By the second week of this controversy,
the American public discovered that this type of document was
not a photocopy of an original birth certificate
completed at birth, but was, instead, a shortened transcript of a
person's birth record.
This transcript is called, a "Certification of
Live Birth," or COLB as I came to call
it. A COLB is what Hawaii's Department of Health now issues in
place of actual photocopies of the original, long-form birth
certificate. The COLB is a "short form birth
certificate," and when duly certified by them, can be used
for all intents and purposes that a regular birth
certificate would be used.
A genuine COLB (as shown below with private data covered by tape)
contains the names of the Father, Mother and Child, the
"race" of the Mother and Father, the time and date of
birth, and the island and city of birth. Regardless of a person's
actual birth date, anyone authorized to request this COLB, will
receive the specific data currently listed on a person's
actual birth record, on the date the copy was created.
This last criteria is crucial to understand because so many of
the criticisms leveled against it had to do with
the "apparent" conundrum posed by a
computer-generated certificate for people whose birth predated
the computer age.
This is the front side of a genuine COLB:
src="http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/Michele-front.jpg">
And, this the reverse side of a genuine COLB:
src="http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/Michele-back.jpg">
Computer printout or photocopy, notwithstanding, many people were
still aggitated by the apparent lack of visually recognizable
features on the Obama COLB that would attest to its validity,
such as an embossed seal, official signatures, and a date stamp
as shown in the images above. Keep in mind that the public was
shown only one scanned image of Obama's alleged COLB, and that
was its front side. Had a scan of the reverse side been
made, the questions about the absence of seals and stamps would
have been answered.
That is, of course, IF the scanned image was genuine.
Which it never was from the beginning.
The birth of the forgery
Initially, as someone who had also never seen a Hawaiian COLB
before, I was also critical of the omissions apparently absent
from Obama's COLB. However, once I got to examine the
alleged Obama COLB up close, the focus of my criticisms quickly
changed.
Although Obama's COLB image did not look the same as a
traditional birth certificate, what captured my attention was not
its contents, or lack thereof, but the image anomalies I saw
-- anomalies that never would appear in any genuine
scan of this document.
Specifically, I saw that the text in this image bore the telltale
signs of being graphically altered after the image had been
created. From June 13 onwards, the unfamiliar format of this
document, and the questionable information that it contained,
became tangential to my discovery that the scanned
image alleged to be a true copy Obama's original COLB, was a
forged document image . Today, with three months
worth of research and supportive evidence behind me, I can
now say, without any reservations, that my initial recognition of
this image forgery was absolutely correct.
Surprisingly, the same people who posted this forged image three months earlier, namely the Obama Campaign, the pro-Obama Daily Kos blog, and the pro-Obama
FactCheck group, are still passing it off as a
genuine copy of Obama's original birth certificate. At
no time during this 3-month period, did any of these pro-Obama
groups submit a second scanned image to corroborate the
first one, such as a scan of the reverse side where the
certification elements appear: the embossed Seal of Hawaii, the
date stamp, and the signature stamp of Hawaii's State
Registrar.
Rather than make that second scan, FactCheck recently compounded
their role in the forgery by posting suspicious-looking photos of
the same document that they claimed to have scanned in June 16.
Since I now have no doubt that their scanned image was
fraudulent, I have no reason to believe that their
"photographs" are any less fraudulent. Later on, I will
explain why these photos are so suspicious.
Supporters of Obama spent a great deal of time trying to explain
away these fradulent actions, but logic and subterfuge are no
substitutes for having independent observers examine not only
Obama's original birth certificate, but also a current
COLB containing his current birth record -- two
things that the American public have yet to see.
I've been working with computers, printers, and scanners, going
back to 1969, and with graphic arts as far back as 1965, and
given a set of printed letters, I can discern what kind of device
made them. Printer output is quite different from the text
created by a graphics program, and even if a document looks
"official," it may not be. More importantly,
graphically altered text in an image would look the same
regardless of what was scanned to create the image.
For comparative purposes, shown below is the same copy
of Obama's alleged ""original birth
certificate," a.k.a, a COLB, that was posted June 12 on the
Daily Kos website. Following the Kos image is the only other
Hawaiian COLB found on the Internet at that time. I verified that
finding by doing an exhaustive Internet search looking for any
other COLB examples, only to come back to that same, single
image:
width="585" height="575">
width="553" height="540">
Both of these images are in JPG format, which is the most commonly used format with scanners and digital cameras. The reason why JPGs are the preferred format
is because they can compress a lot of picture information into a
much smaller file size. For example, the image of the Kos COLB
shown above would consume over 16 megabytes of file space if
it were not compressed; but, as a compressed JPG
image, it only consumes one-half of a megabyte of file
space. The tradeoff in space savings, however, is a loss of
fine detail that was present in the original image produced
by a scanner or camera.
Like any printed certificate, the COLB has a border that
"frames" the body of information it contains. The
original COLB certificate is printed on an 8 1/2" x
11" letter-sized sheet of paper having a
green-and-white "Rattan" pattern. The top part of the
COLB is blank, and when removed, what remains is an 8 1/2"
square of paper. The crosshatched border, however, measures
8.09" x 7.90" and is not exactly square. The COLB
borders are changed from year to year as a way to distinguish
them from other genuine COLBS, and from fraudulent COLBs whose
date stamp (and other year-relevant information) does not
corresponds to the border used that year.
Until I received a copy of a genuine 2007 COLB and confirmed that
its borders were similar to Obama's COLB, critics were still
taking issue with the look of its border, as compared to the
borders on 2008 COLBs.
Once the COLB Genie was out of the bottle, other genuine COLBs started made their appearances on the Internet:
width="465" height="640">
width="803" height="768">
After seeing how differently the Obama COLB borders looked in comparison to these other COLB images, I also had issues about its validity and purpose. Yet, unlike other
critics and researchers, verifying the border was never crucial
to my investigation. From the very beginning, I theorized that
the Obama COLB image had been "manufactured" using
someone else's COLB as a template or starting point. I also made
allowances for the possibility that a real 2007 COLB could have
provided the border for the forgery, even if the rest of it was
not used for the other components of the COLB. I had not actually
seen what a genuine 2007 COLB looked like, so I focused my
research on everything else that lay inside of the border. If the
Obama COLB image was, in fact, graphically altered to make it
look like an "official" birth certificate, then the
border pattern would be inconsequential compared to passing off
fraudulent information as genuine -- especially when no one else
had ever seen a genuine 2007 COLB before.
Then, the unthinkable happended when I received a genuine 2007 COLB issued less than three months before Obama's COLB was allegedly issued to him or to one of his family
members. It was a deal-breaker!
Here was a genuine 2007 COLB, with a border similar to the Obama COLB, that Obama supporters could triumphantly claim was proof that the Obama COLB was genuine. It
was also a death knell for another researcher who had based his
work on his claim that 2007 COLBs had the same border as 2008
COLBs (as shown above). Needless to say, I was also aware of
other fabricated evidence that he produced, but I had pledged to
a friend that I would keep the revelations to myself.
Before I ever received a genuine paper COLB, I had no idea how it would look and feel in person. The most surprising thing about the COLB is how thin is the paper
that it's printed on. It's as thin and light as a piece of cheap
copy paper. The green and white pattern is only on the front
side, and whatever pattern that one sees on the reverse side is
actually coming from the pattern on the front side.
While both the Daily Kos and Obama's website (aka, "Fight
The Smears") posted trimmed copies of the same COLB image,
FactCheck.org posted the letter-sized version of the same image
copy. Although these three image copies are made from the same
source image, they were intentionally made to look different from
one another (this will be explained later on).
For display purposes, I am using the Kos copy of the image
because it was the first one posted on the Internet, and the
first one to catch my eye. Obama's "Fight the Smears"
website posted their small, illegible copy of the image after the
Kos did, and a week later, FactCheck.org posted theirs.
How Hawaii creates (and how one gets) a genuine Hawaiian
COLB.
The entire Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth is a
computer-generated graphic that is printed on specially
patterned, green and white paper (as shown above). Usually,
official certificates are printed on patterned paper that also
have a ready-made border. As a safety measure (or as a
recognition tool), Vital Records has generated different border
patterns every year since November 2001, or when this form
was put into service (as indicated by the footnote in the bottom
left corner). Although the border patterns were changed annually,
the border dimensions have remained the same (well...not exactly
as I'll explain below).
The computer-generated COLB is like a form-fillable PDF file. In
fact, you can order a copy of a Hawaiian COLB (if you're
authorized to get one) by completing an order form that is a
form-fillable PDF file on Hawaii's Vital Records website:
Certificate Order Form. face="Verdana">
More than likely, what a computer operator at Vital Records gets to see, when responding to a request for a COLB, is a graphically-created template with blank
fields that are replaced by the information requested on the
order form. That's the Catch-22 in ordering a COLB: you only get
back what you correctly request to see. If the name of the father
on the form does not match the name of the father on the official
birth record, then what you get back is a blank space where the
father's name would be.
Once the birth record data has been inputted into the COLB form, it is then sent to a networked laser printer to be printed off on a sheet of COLB paper.
Recognizing "red flags" in an image forgery.
Transferring the computer-generated COLB into a high-quality image file can easily be done with any computer scanner (even with ones that cost less than $100).
Scanning a full-sized letter document into a digital image file
initially requires a lot of computer memory and file space.
However, as a way to reduce the file size while maintaining some
of the document quality, the image is saved in a compressed image
file format known as JPG (pronounced, "Jay-Peg"). With
JPG files, there is always a tradeoff between the file size and
the amount of detailed information that can be saved in it. As a
consequence of scanning text documents and saving them as JPG
files, there will always be some degree of distortion in parts of
the document image, particularly around areas of line art and
text in the document.
However, the distortion patterns that I initially found when examining the text in the Obama COLB image, were ones that are not produced by either a printer, scanner, or
the compression factor of the JPG image. Critics of mine have
tried to explain away these patterns as "scanner
artifacts" or "JPG arifacts," but to no avail. The
anomalies that I found should not be there if a document was
faithfully scanned from an original paper document. Yet, these
anomalies are there for all to see, and are proof-positive that
the text in an original image was deliberately altered, after the
image was created, by someone using an image editing program.
Normally, there should be a lot of green pixels from the
background showing up between the letters on the COLB,
but there is noticeable lack of green pixels can be seen in
the word BIRTH (taken from CITY, TOWN, OR LOCATION OF BIRTH) as
shown in the following two examples. The first example is from
the Obama COLB image followed by an example from the genuine 2007
COLB (which I will call "Dan's COLB")
src="http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/kosbirth.jpg"
width="32" height="315">
width="32" height="315">
Take a look at the area between the letters in the Obama COLB: very little, if any, hint of green from the background. Plenty of grey and white pixels instead --
exactly the pattern that would result from replacing the existing
text with other text.
Now, look at the area in between the letters in Dan's COLB. Lots of green shades from the background -- exactly what should be there if an image is a genuine
scan of a laser-printed document.
All of the type on this document was produced by the same graphics program. Whatever made the text for all of the headings also made the text for all of the entries.
Any text made by a typewriter, laser printer, or even inkjet
printer, on a piece of colored paper, would have that color
showing between the letters. When the paper is digitally scanned,
it would still have some of that color showing between the
letters. What it would not have, are only smeared, black
& white pixels between them. Pixels are the dots that combine
to make a digital image or photo. There would always be several
pixels bearing the same color as the paper. Printed type produced
by a graphics program will look about the same regardless of the
magnification, with a minimal number of white and grey pixel
patterns between the letters.
Here are some examples:
Here is the "HOUR OF BIRTH" header from Barack's COLB
enlarged 5 times:
src="http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/BHO-birth.jpg">
Here's the same data header taken from Dan's 2007 COLB scanned at the same resolution with the same amount of file compression.
This is how this text data should look on a genuine, unretouched document image.
Some of my original complaints about this COLB image was the lack of a signature from individuals within the State's Department of Health who are authorized to
reproduce the document, and an embossed seal to certify that the
document is genuine, along with a date stamp. However, the
date stamp did bleed through from the other side, and it was
clear enough to read with the naked eye: June 6, 2007.
Not long after this uproar, there were ways discovered for
restoring this lost detail in the image. Via image enhancements,
the seal, and the signature block were visible, albeit not nearly
as evident as in the genuine image scans. However, a significant
feature was not recovered at all in the Obama COLB -- and that is
the second fold line that always appears in geniune COLBs.
End of Part One
In Part Two, I will explain how the forgery was made, and also demonstrate how to make one. I will also provide a full deconstruction of the phony photographs
that FactCheck posted on August 16.
-
Permalink Reply by anne in texas on
-
None of the examples of the other birth certificates had the baby's weight or the name of the doctor delivering it.
Also, the dates of those certificates are 1930, 1977, 1980 and 1990. Of course there would be minor/insignificant differences in the paper, design and printing. Get a grip people. Your zealotry in undermining a legitimate President elect is silly and frankly deranged.
-
Permalink Reply by Yoel on -
LAWSUIT CONTINUES OVER OBAMA'S BIRTH RECORDS
By NWV News Director, Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
November 10, 2008
Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Pennsylvania attorney who filed a lawsuit suit against Barack H. Obama, challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. Berg is taking legal action in order to view President-Elect Barack Obama's birth certificate and other similar documents.
Surprisingly, no one has seen Obama's birth records and any effort to view them has been thwarted by his campaign and the so-called mainstream news media.
Berg's writ requests review of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the Democrat National Committee and the other co-Defendants.
According to court documents, the US Supreme Court has set dates in which Barack Obama, the DNC and all co-Defendants are to respond to the Writ, which is on or before December 1, 2008.
Mr. Berg told NewsWithView.Com, “I look forward to receiving Defendant Obama's response to the Writ and am hopeful the US Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”
Mr. Berg’s case, Berg vs. Obama was dismissed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket # 08-cv-4083 for lack of standing. Mr. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari for review of the case and an injunction to stay the election pending review. Justice Souter denied the injunction. It is expected that the Court will decide whether or not to review Berg v. Obama after the Defendants file their response, and Mr. Berg has replied to the Defendant’s response.
Berg said, "I [was] totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States... I immediately appealed to the US Supreme Court."
"This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?"
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned, Berg added, "According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution. What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863. We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
The US Constitution stipulates: "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States..."
"When Arnold Schwarzenegger ran for -- and won -- the governorship of California, many in the liberal Republican establishment and the new media lamented the fact that he was not an American-born citizen and therefore was ineligible to run for president of this nation. Now it seems these same people are looking the other way to avoid exposing Senator Obama as an unconstitutional presidential candidate," said political consultant Mike Baker in an interview with NewswithViews.com.
Berg, the plaintiff stated in court papers that he is a life long Democrat who had always been proud of his Party:
Plaintiff is a licensed attorney in good standing and has taken an oath to uphold the United States Constitution. Plaintiff and many other citizens of the United States have donated money and time to Democratic Presidential candidates as well as to the Democratic National Committee, in reliance on promises and assurances made by the DNC in the Democratic Party Agenda. It provides that the Democrat Party’s goals, among others, are to “restore accountability, honesty and openness at all levels of government”, to “restore the Constitution and protect the civil rights and liberties of all Americans” and to “uphold the Constitution.”
To uphold the Constitution includes making sure that the Presidential candidate is eligible to serve as President pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of our United States Constitution and that such candidate runs a fair and legitimate campaign.
In vetting the Presidential candidate the DNC and FEC are required to ensure the eligibility requirements pursuant to our Constitution are met and the Presidential candidate, if elected, would be eligible to serve as President. To be eligible and qualified to run for and/or serve for Office of the President of the United States a person must be a “natural born” citizen. United States Constitution, Article II, Section I. The natural born citizen clause has prohibited many prominent Americans from becoming President, including Governor Schwarzenegger and former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright and Henry Kissinger.
The DNC has nominated Obama as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States.
There are many unanswered questions regarding Obama’s citizenship status:
1. Is Obama a “natural born” United States citizen?
2. Is Obama a “naturalized” United States citizen?
3. Is Obama a citizen of Indonesia?
The Defendants' response is due by December 1st and Mr. Berg's reply will be submitted thereafter.
-
Permalink Reply by Sharbano on -
This could be a disaster. If this runs its course and evidence is such that he is ineligible I can foresee events that would bring about another civil war, considering those who voted for him are in such awe of him and would rise up against it. I suspect it would bring into question whether or not McCain is truly legitimate as a candidate also. This scenario could very well leave Bush in office, which interestingly has been a possiblity by some that Bush would remain President even though his term expires. If such an uprising occurs Bush would possibly have to institute Martial Law and thus remain in power. This would allow him to maintain his push for his two-state solution. It was said that Bush is to visit Israel three times. If this Does happen be wary because dire events are on the horizon.
About
Jew-Safe Search!
Read more how you can help.
Apply for the Discover® Miles Card today! link goes direct to application
Top Stories
Support our Advertisers!
II top views
Visit our Sponsors!
Birthdays
Wear Your Pride, Insider Out!
© 2009 Created by Israel Insider
